Tag Archives: Gavin Arvizo
The Myth of the Arvizos Not Wanting Money
Michael Jackson’s detractors often try to elevate Gavin Arvizo’s credibility by claiming that the Arvizo family (unlike all of Jackson’s other accusers) was never after money. After all they went to a criminal trial, not a civil. Here is this … Continue reading
Debunking Jim Clemente
Jim Clemente is a former New York State prosecutor and former FBI profiler. After leaving those jobs he has been working in the media – for example as a writer and producer on crime shows or as a podcast host. … Continue reading
Posted in Frequently Asked Questions, The 1993 Allegations, The 2005 Allegations
Tagged description, false sexual abuse allegations, FBI, fried hard drives, Gavin Arvizo, genitalia, hard drives, interstate transport, Jim Clemente, Jordan Chandler, Mann Act, Michael Jackson, penis, sexual abuse allegations, sexual molestation allegations
Leave a comment
What about Jackson’s sharing his bedroom with unrelated children?
Some people base their own “guilty” verdict about Michael Jackson on his own statement of seeing nothing wrong with sharing a bed with unrelated children. To be sure, we do not advocate this behavior (that directly led to The 2005 … Continue reading
The 2005 Arvizo Allegations (summary version)
On November 18, 2003 an arrest warrant was issued for Michael Jackson based on the allegations of a 13-year-old boy, Gavin Arvizo, that Jackson had sexually molested him in February-March, 2003. The case resulted in a criminal trial in 2005 … Continue reading
General credibility problems with the Arvizo family
In this article we will discuss some other events, outside of their allegations against Michael Jackson, which highlight the Arvizo family’s credibility problems. While some of the media in 2005 pretended that the information you will find in this article … Continue reading
Lawyers being hired and the formation of the allegations
On March 24, 2003 Janet Arvizo formally hired William Dickerman as her attorney and Dickerman began writing letters to Jackson’s attorney, Mark Geragos on her behalf demanding the return of furniture, clothes, documents and various other items which were put … Continue reading
The Changing Content of the Allegations and Contradictions
Since there was no material evidence (DNA, blood, sperm, any kind of medical evidence, love letters etc.) that would link Michael Jackson to the alleged crime the case eventually came down to the credibility of the accuser and his family. … Continue reading
The Conspiracy Charge
The conspiracy charge was one of the charges brought against Michael Jackson in 2005. The prosecution’s initial felony complaint in December 2003 [1] did not include this charge, it was later added, after the Grand Jury hearings, and this addition … Continue reading
The crucial period: February 7-March 12, 2003
In the hindsight, when they made their allegations, the Arvizos claimed that during this period, February 7-March 12, 2003, they were kept captive at Neverland against their will. During their alleged captivity the Arvizos went shopping several times, visited a … Continue reading
The Michael Jackson Allegations 